Ben here! I am hosting a Musical Blog Party on my Other Blog This Blog has been open for Guest Posting!!! Our Guest today is a Miss Christine Eyre. Thank you so much for participating, Christine. I'll give you the stage now :-)
*Claps as Christine takes the spot-light.*
Day 2—A musical you
have a love/hate relationship with
Hoo boy. This was a small
challenge, because I tend to love a musical (The
Phantom of the Opera, Jane Eyre, A Tale of Two Cities)
or dislike it (Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, Seven
Brides for Seven Brothers [those just aren’t
my type]). Mixed feelings about musicals are rare.
But one musical does merit
this complicated emotion: The Music Man (1962
film). At first, I
fully disliked it, and
still dislike several aspects, but sometimes musicals just have to
grow on me. I’ll end with the reasons why I like it so as to
finish on a positive note.
Oh, and before I explain
what I dislike, please know that I’m not trying to offend anyone or
squash a favorite musical into poor, sad pulp.
So here’s what I
dislike:
The worst turn-off in The
Music Man is the manipulation. Manipulation
drives me nuts, which is one reason I dislike many “comedy” TV
shows. Maybe the story wasn’t trying to justify
Harold Hill’s behavior, but some of his slick moves were played for
humor. I don’t understand this is supposed to be funny. It shows
a lack of logic on both sides, and a lack of integrity in the
character of Professor Hill.
The prime example of this
manipulation problem is the song “You’ve Got Trouble.” It’s
a catchy song, but not as fun as it is frustrating to me.
Hey, calm down and quit
throwing rotten oranges! (Tomatoes are boring.) What’s
frustrating is the number of logical fallacies in Professor Hill’s
“argument”. He creates a fear and then plays on it, a fallacy
called, naturally, “appeal to fear,” and one that uses fear of
what might happen as the only basis for doing something. Harold Hill
also calls the pool table a forerunner to corruption, which is the
“slippery slope” fallacy, one that assumes a chain of disastrous
events will follow X insignificant action. And Professor Hill’s
“signs of corruption” have nothing to do with the pool table.
This fallacy is called “after this; therefore, because of this,”
which assumes that because the kid had a nicotine stain on his index
finger after the pool
table came in, said pool table must have caused
an interest in cigarettes.
The underlying problem is
that Harold Hill doesn’t have an argument founded on facts and
reason. So he can only prophecy dire consequences of tolerating the
pool table—and the whole town buys the argument (or lack of it),
except Marian.
Speaking of Marian, I
dislike the ending of her character arc. In Act I, she is cautious
(though cold) toward Harold Hill, refusing his romantic overtures and
entertaining sensible skepticism toward his schemes. She stuck to
her standards for a future spouse, even when her mother pressures her
to consider Harold Hill as a suitor. Which is why it drives me nuts
when, in Act II, she drops all those standards and gets enamored with
Professor Hill even after she knew that he’d lied to the town.
I—I—I—what?!?! There went my respect for her, and it’s
incredibly frustrating to lose respect for any story character.
But the musical did grow
on me, and I came to like several aspects. The music is catchy, for
one thing, and some of the songs are fun, such as “76 Trombones,”
“Lida Rose/Will I Ever Tell You? “and “Marian the Librarian”.
In fact, “Marian the
Librarian,” is my favorite song—it’s fun, the choreography is
cool, and I totally relate to her annoyance with the interrupted
library work.
And though Marian changes in the second act, I really liked her
character in the first act: she was sensible, hardworking, tried to
encourage intelligence and open minds, and put up with gossip and
scorn.
Also, some parts of the
musical were hilarious without requiring manipulation for laughs—such
as, the mayor getting his words mixed up (“Not one poop out of you
madam!”) and the Independence Day exercises in the school
gymnasium. And the ladies doing upright posture exercises when their
“dance” required them to bend over!
Speaking of dancing, The
Music Man has some amazing choreography. The
dancers made it all look so easy. “Madame Librarian” had some
fun dancing in it, but “76 Trombones” probably has the best.
And I liked the end of
Harold Hill’s character arc: he (spoilers!) comes clean, confesses
that he’d been misleading the town, and explains the truth to the
kid who looked up to him. Professor Hill also led the band as he’d
promised to do.
So, The
Music Man. Definitely a love-hate
relationship, but it grew on me to the point that if a sibling puts
it on, I’ll probably sit down and watch it.
That's all for now folks. Share your thoughts in the comments! Thank you again, Christine, for blogging. Hope to see you again!
BEN.
Thanks for letting me guest post! I love this musicals-themed blog party!
ReplyDeleteI've never seen the Music Man, but I've wanted to for a long time. It looked funny :) Manipulation is very hard, which is why I am not wild about the whole Christine/Phantom thing. ANYWAY! Good blog post! This is so fun!!
ReplyDeleteThe difference between Phantom the The Music Man is that in MM, the manipulation is sometimes played for humor. In PotO, the Phantom is the antagonist: pitiable, but dangerous, and I don't think the story justifies his manipulation.
DeleteSome parts of The Music Man are really funny--and the songs are (most of them) fun or catchy or rousing! My siblings and I like The Music Man more for the music than for the story. :-)